2008 program
AlwaysOn GoingGreen 2008
2007 archives
AlwaysOn GoingGreen 2007
Programs by EcoWorld
Send an
Electronic
Postcard
by derickjeff on 11/20/08
Coal-to-Liquids -- that is,
the conversion of coal to
liquid transport fuels...
by Ed Ring on 11/19/08
A recent email received
posed seven questions
regarding 'A Centrist Agen...
by meAgain on 11/19/08
I am # 29 on the e-list. I
wish I was on the h-list too
but will be satisfied wi...
by Hari Aparajith on 11/19/08
To add to my comment above,
the process will emit 2.2
tons of CO2 for every ton...
by fred on 11/18/08
Al Fin, Obviously you didn't
read the article
closely...the solar facili...
by Solar Sailor... on 11/18/08
[...] More: Solar
Sailor-Winged Ships [...]
by Brian J. Don... on 11/18/08
Louisiana Enacts the Most
Comprehensive Advanced
Biofuel Legislation in t...
EcoWorld Commentary
Ed Ring,
Editor-in-Chief
Daniela Muhawi,
Editor-at-Large
Contributing Editors
(comments are welcome)

Maps & Information




Today is Thursday November 20, 2008
Editor's Commentary

Skyscraper Farms

Posted on: November 14th, 2007 by Ed Ring

Today we caught up with Dr. Dickson Despommier, a professor of environmental health at Columbia University, who is arguably the world’s leading proponent of “vertical farming” or, if you will, industrial scale hydroponic and aeroponic crop production within high-rise buildings.  If you go to his website www.verticalfarm.com, you will find a very in-depth body of work exploring the feasibility of this idea.

A cross-sectional depiction of the vertical farm.

It makes a lot of sense.  In a way, it totally inverts the conventional wisdom of many of today’s agriculturalists.  Instead of using the biosphere to power the technosphere, we are using the technosphere to power the biosphere. 

That is to say - and this is a loose, but useful, interpretation of these terms - if the technosphere corresponds to the global industrial economy, we currently need about 550 quadrillion BTUs per year to power our machines, and biofuel coming from our biosphere will be hard pressed to supply this amount of energy. 

Notwithstanding the rising use of biosphere for biofuel, for the most part our biosphere still only has to be used to grow food, and we can feed all of humanity for only about 17 quadrillion BTUs per year.  This is based on 2,000 calories per day per human, which equates to 2,326 watt-hours per day per human, times 6.0 billion humans, times 365 days per year, which equates to 582 gigawatt-years to fuel all of humanity.  At 33.4 gigawatt years per 1.0 quadrillion BTUs, that is a paltry 17.4 quadrillion BTUS.

So it makes more sense to use the technosphere - factory farming, high-rise agriculture - to provide biological energy to people, then to use the earth’s biosphere to provide biofuel energy to the machines of civilization.  Because on this earth, machines use 30 times as much energy as humans, and that ratio is probably set to increase.

On Despommier’s website there is a wealth of rigorous analysis regarding just how much caloric energy you can extract from a high-rise building; more than can be summarized here.  Go there.  Read it.

But a few very salient points emerge.  If only a portion of a high-rise was dedicated to hydroponic and aeroponic agriculture, the building would be able to process its waste water - as well as waste water from elsewhere on the utility grid - using it to water the plants AND to reuse as drinking water.  Here’s how:  The grey water extracted from sewage would be subjected to biological and mechanical filtration, then it would be used to water the plants.  The plants, in turn, would transpirate heavily in the indoor environment, and dehumidifiers would harvest this water - this transpirated water would be pristine drinking water, able to be pumped back upstairs or into the utility grid for reuse.  This concept of using transpiration from plants in a commercial high-rise agricultural operation to provide the last mile of grey water purification in the urban environment is revolutionary.  Along with the surprisingly low, and dropping, cost of desalination, and advances being made in primary sewage treatment, this innovation could SOLVE the issues of potential water scarcity in the urban environment.

The quantity of food that a high-rise farm might produce is also surprising.  Because the plants are grown in optimal conditions - abundant light and water, and no pests - they can yield 3-4 crops per year instead of one, and each crop may require no more than five vertical feet of space.  This means each story of high-rise space occupying an area of one acre, for example, can literally produce twelve times as much food per year as an acre of ordinary farmland.  This multiple order-of-magnitude increase in potential productivity per unit of land, combined with the proximity to market, combined with the water and energy positive nature of the undertaking, means high-rise farming is merely waiting for economic and political conditions to align in its favor.  The technology for high-rise farming is for the most part already here, and it will be available when we need it to feed the burgeoning megacities of this world.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 14th, 2007 at 12:02 am and is filed under Biofuel, Buildings, CleanTech, Politics, Water. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Skyscraper Farms”

  1. Carson Chen Says:

    Dear Sir:

    Read the article of so called” Skyscrper Farm” which is definitely doable. However, we have to consider “is it practical?

    Yes it could be calculated for a huge productivity and so many advantages e.g. health food, city clearer, save more transportation costs,———

    It has to be reevaluated for the costs such as
    building cost?
    Sunlight enough?
    Water and control System cost?
    Operation Costs?
    Maintanance cost?
    seeds nursey? Plown costs?
    Liquid fertilizer? and others……….
    how much each Kg corn to be under this condition vs regular
    corn
    Believe, it would be promising if the prices not too much
    difference even double, would be encouraged.

    Would most interested in the model comparison if some one
    could provide. Very Appreciate.

    Carson Chen
    e-mail address: carsonchen0308@yahoo.com.tw

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Sustainable Land Development Today
AUTO SHIPPING
New Hybrid Cars
Toyota Prius
Cheap Gas Prices
Latest Hybrid Cars
GreenBuzz Newsletter

Archives

November 2008 (5)
October 2008 (11)
September 2008 (11)
August 2008 (6)
July 2008 (10)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (12)
April 2008 (10)
March 2008 (23)
February 2008 (11)
January 2008 (12)
December 2007 (17)
2008 (118)
2007 (127)
2006 (102)

Links

Affordable Housing Design
Alternative Energy Blog
Alternative Energy Stocks
Alternative Energy Today
AlwaysOn - High Tech & Green Tech
American Dream Coalition
American Institute of Architects
AutoblogGreen
Big Biofuels Blog
BIOconversion Blog
Biofuel Review
BlueVoice.org
Camino Energy
Cato Institute
Clean Edge
Cleantech Blog
Climate Science
CNET Greentech
Congress for the New Urbanism
earth2tech
Edmunds Green Car Advisor
Electric Power Research Institute
Environmental Republican
ESRI Conservation Program
EV World
Evangelical Ecologist
Green Business
Green Car Congress
Green Car Guide
GreenBiz
Greencar.com
Greenpeace Blog
Gristmill
Hybrid Car Blog
ICIS Biofuels Blog
International Atomic Energy Agency
International Energy Agency
International Solar Energy Society
Living Lands & Waters
Money Morning
Mongabay.com
National Biodiesel Board
National Hydropower Association
National Renewable Energy Lab
New Urban News
Oilgae.com
Pension Tsunami
Rainforest Action Network
RealClimate.org
Renewable Energy Stocks
Rocky Mountain Institute
SeaWatch.org
SeaWeb.org
Sierra Club Compass Blog
Society for Ecological Restoration
Solar Energy Industries Association
SolarBuzz.com
The Antiplanner
The Energy Blog
The Green Car Website
The Reason Foundation
The Wildlands Project
Treehugger
Trees Water People
U.S. Green Building Council
UN Food & Agricultural Organization
Urban Land Institute
Urban Planning Blog
US Dept. of Energy
US Environmental Protection Agency
WildAid
World Coal Institute
World Nuclear Association
World Resources Institute
World Wildlife Fund